Embryos, individuals, and persons: an argument against embryo creation and research.
نویسنده
چکیده
One strategy for arguing that it should be legally permissible to create human embryos, or to use spare human embryos, for scientific research purposes involves the claim that such embryos cannot be persons because they are not human individuals while twinning may yet take place. Being a human individual is considered to be by most people a necessary condition for being a human person. I argue first that such an argument against the personhood of embryos must be rationally conclusive if their destruction in public places such as laboratories is to be countenanced. I base this argument on a popular understanding of the role that the notion of privacy plays in abortion laws. I then argue that such arguments against personhood are not rationally conclusive. The claim that the early embryos is not a human individual is not nearly as obvious as some assert.
منابع مشابه
Are human embryos Kantian persons?: Kantian considerations in favor of embryonic stem cell research
One argument used by detractors of human embryonic stem cell research (hESCR) invokes Kant's formula of humanity, which proscribes treating persons solely as a means to an end, rather than as ends in themselves. According to Fuat S. Oduncu, for example, adhering to this imperative entails that human embryos should not be disaggregated to obtain pluripotent stem cells for hESCR. Given that human...
متن کاملEmbryo deaths in reproduction and embryo research: a reply to Murphy's double effect argument.
The majority of embryos created in natural reproduction die spontaneously within a few weeks of conception. Some have argued that, therefore, if one believes the embryo is a person (in the normative sense) one should find 'natural' reproduction morally problematic. An extension of this argument holds that, if one accepts embryo deaths in natural reproduction, consistency requires that one also ...
متن کاملI-21: Embryo Relinquishment for Reproduction
Background: The conceptualization of the transfer of embryos between the individuals who created them to one or more recipients for family-building is hotly contested – particularly as regards whether the practice should be most appropriately considered to be “donation” or “adoption”. This paper examines this debate, considering the research carried out on the intentions and decisions of those ...
متن کاملHuman embryonic stem cell research debates: a confucian argument.
Human embryonic stem cell research can bring about major biomedical breakthroughs and thus contribute enormously to human welfare, yet it raises serious moral problems because it involves using human embryos for experiment. The "moral status of the human embryo" remains the core of such debates. Three different positions regarding the moral status of the human embryo can be categorised: the "al...
متن کاملGLOBAL MEDICAL ETHICS Human embryonic stem cell research debates: a Confucian argument
Human embryonic stem cell research can bring about major biomedical breakthroughs and thus contribute enormously to human welfare, yet it raises serious moral problems because it involves using human embryos for experiment. The ‘‘moral status of the human embryo’’ remains the core of such debates. Three different positions regarding the moral status of the human embryo can be categorised: the ‘...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- Journal of applied philosophy
دوره 18 1 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2001